testing-llm

LLM and AI testing patterns — mock responses, evaluation with DeepEval/RAGAS, structured output validation, and agentic test patterns (generator, healer, planner). Use when testing AI features, validating LLM outputs, or building evaluation pipelines.

LLM & AI Testing Patterns

Patterns and tools for testing LLM integrations, evaluating AI output quality, mocking responses for deterministic CI, and applying agentic test workflows (planner, generator, healer).

Quick Reference

AreaFilePurpose
Rulesrules/llm-evaluation.mdDeepEval quality metrics, Pydantic schema validation, timeout testing
Rulesrules/llm-mocking.mdMock LLM responses, VCR.py recording, custom request matchers
Referencereferences/deepeval-ragas-api.mdFull API reference for DeepEval and RAGAS metrics
Referencereferences/generator-agent.mdTransforms Markdown specs into Playwright tests
Referencereferences/healer-agent.mdAuto-fixes failing tests (selectors, waits, dynamic content)
Referencereferences/planner-agent.mdExplores app and produces Markdown test plans
Checklistchecklists/llm-test-checklist.mdComplete LLM testing checklist (setup, coverage, CI/CD)
Exampleexamples/llm-test-patterns.mdFull examples: mocking, structured output, DeepEval, VCR, golden datasets

When to Use This Skill

  • Testing code that calls LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.)
  • Validating RAG pipeline output quality
  • Setting up deterministic LLM tests in CI
  • Building evaluation pipelines with quality gates
  • Applying agentic test patterns (plan -> generate -> heal)

LLM Mock Quick Start

Mock LLM responses for fast, deterministic unit tests:

from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch
import pytest

@pytest.fixture
def mock_llm():
    mock = AsyncMock()
    mock.return_value = {"content": "Mocked response", "confidence": 0.85}
    return mock

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_with_mocked_llm(mock_llm):
    with patch("app.core.model_factory.get_model", return_value=mock_llm):
        result = await synthesize_findings(sample_findings)
    assert result["summary"] is not None

Key rule: NEVER call live LLM APIs in CI. Use mocks for unit tests, VCR.py for integration tests.

DeepEval Quality Quick Start

Validate LLM output quality with multi-dimensional metrics:

from deepeval import assert_test
from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase
from deepeval.metrics import AnswerRelevancyMetric, FaithfulnessMetric

test_case = LLMTestCase(
    input="What is the capital of France?",
    actual_output="The capital of France is Paris.",
    retrieval_context=["Paris is the capital of France."],
)

assert_test(test_case, [
    AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7),
    FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8),
])

2026 library updates (DeepEval 2.3, RAGAS 1.2)

DeepEval 2.3 introduces self-explaining scores — every metric now emits a reason field alongside the numeric score, so a failing CI build gets a human-readable explanation without a second LLM call:

metric = AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7, include_reason=True)
metric.measure(test_case)
print(metric.score, metric.reason)
# 0.62  "Response addresses the topic but omits the date asked for."

RAGAS 1.2 ships dynamic recalibration — when the grader model drifts (e.g. GPT-5.2 → future Gemini 3.1), RAGAS records the shift and adjusts the threshold so historical scores stay comparable across evals:

from ragas.evaluation import evaluate
from ragas.metrics import faithfulness, context_recall

result = evaluate(
    dataset,
    metrics=[faithfulness, context_recall],
    recalibrate=True,   # 1.2+ — normalizes against the grader baseline
)

Bump floors: deepeval >= 2.3, ragas >= 1.2. Older releases silently drop the reason/recalibrate kwargs.

Quality Metrics Thresholds

MetricThresholdPurpose
Answer Relevancy>= 0.7Response addresses question
Faithfulness>= 0.8Output matches context
Hallucination<= 0.3No fabricated facts
Context Precision>= 0.7Retrieved contexts relevant
Context Recall>= 0.7All relevant contexts retrieved

Structured Output Validation

Always validate LLM output with Pydantic schemas:

from pydantic import BaseModel, Field

class LLMResponse(BaseModel):
    answer: str = Field(min_length=1)
    confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0)
    sources: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list)

async def test_structured_output():
    result = await get_llm_response("test query")
    parsed = LLMResponse.model_validate(result)
    assert 0 <= parsed.confidence <= 1.0

VCR.py for Integration Tests

Record and replay LLM API calls for deterministic integration tests:

@pytest.fixture(scope="module")
def vcr_config():
    import os
    return {
        "record_mode": "none" if os.environ.get("CI") else "new_episodes",
        "filter_headers": ["authorization", "x-api-key"],
    }

@pytest.mark.vcr()
async def test_llm_integration():
    response = await llm_client.complete("Say hello")
    assert "hello" in response.content.lower()

Agentic Test Workflow

The three-agent pattern for end-to-end test automation:

Planner -> specs/*.md -> Generator -> tests/*.spec.ts -> Healer (auto-fix)
  1. Planner (references/planner-agent.md): Explores your app, produces Markdown test plans from PRDs or natural language requests. Requires seed.spec.ts for app context.

  2. Generator (references/generator-agent.md): Converts Markdown specs into Playwright tests. Actively validates selectors against the running app. Uses semantic locators (getByRole, getByLabel, getByText).

  3. Healer (references/healer-agent.md): Automatically fixes failing tests by replaying failures, inspecting the DOM, and patching locators/waits. Max 3 healing attempts per test.

Edge Cases to Always Test

For every LLM integration, cover these paths:

  • Empty/null inputs -- empty strings, None values
  • Long inputs -- truncation behavior near token limits
  • Timeouts -- fail-open vs fail-closed behavior
  • Schema violations -- invalid structured output
  • Prompt injection -- adversarial input resistance
  • Unicode -- non-ASCII characters in prompts and responses

See checklists/llm-test-checklist.md for the complete checklist.

Anti-Patterns

Anti-PatternCorrect Approach
Live LLM calls in CIMock for unit, VCR for integration
Random seedsFixed seeds or mocked responses
Single metric evaluation3-5 quality dimensions
No timeout handlingAlways set < 1s timeout in tests
Hardcoded API keysEnvironment variables, filtered in VCR
Asserting only is not NoneSchema validation + quality metrics

Related Skills

  • ork:testing-unit — Unit testing fundamentals, AAA pattern
  • ork:testing-integration — Integration testing for AI pipelines
  • ork:golden-dataset — Evaluation dataset management