daa-architect
Use when designing a new automation testing framework, scaffolding project structure, or planning test architecture following DAA principles
DAA Framework Architect
REQUIRED BACKGROUND: You MUST understand daa:daa-core before using this skill.
Overview
Use this skill when starting a new E2E automation project, restructuring an existing test suite, or scaling an automation framework. It provides project structure templates and advanced patterns for growing test suites.
When to Use
- New project: Scaffolding directory structure for a DAA-compliant framework
- Migration: Converting POM or flat scripts to DAA three-layer architecture
- Scaling: Test suite growing from 50 → 500+ scenarios; need structured abstraction
Project Scaffold
A DAA-compliant project separates the three layers in the directory structure:
project/
├── lib/ # Framework code (Action + Physical layers)
│ ├── api/ # API testing support
│ │ ├── action_layer.py # Action Layer: API business actions
│ │ └── physical_layer.py # Physical Layer: HTTP client wrapper
│ ├── web/ # Web/UI testing support
│ │ ├── action_layer.py # Action Layer: UI business actions
│ │ ├── physical_layer.py # Physical Layer: browser driver wrapper
│ │ └── constants.py # UI selectors and URLs
│ └── __init__.py
├── tests/ # Test Layer
│ ├── api/
│ │ ├── test_crud.py # API test scenarios
│ │ └── test_workflows.py # API composite workflow tests
│ ├── web/
│ │ └── test_search.py # Web test scenarios
│ └── conftest.py # Test fixtures and configuration
├── config/ # Environment configuration
├── requirements.txt # Dependencies
└── README.md
→ Full template with explanations: project-scaffold.md
Scaling Decision Tree
When Action Layer complexity grows, apply the appropriate design pattern:
digraph scaling {
rankdir=TB;
"Action Layer growing complex?" [shape=diamond];
"Too many parameters?" [shape=diamond];
"API interface mismatch?" [shape=diamond];
"If/else branching?" [shape=diamond];
"Sequential pipeline?" [shape=diamond];
"Apply Builder Pattern" [shape=box];
"Apply Adapter Pattern" [shape=box];
"Apply Strategy Pattern" [shape=box];
"Apply Chain Pattern" [shape=box];
"Extract Composite Action" [shape=box];
"Action Layer growing complex?" -> "Too many parameters?" [label="yes"];
"Action Layer growing complex?" -> "Extract Composite Action" [label="no, just repetition"];
"Too many parameters?" -> "Apply Builder Pattern" [label="yes"];
"Too many parameters?" -> "API interface mismatch?" [label="no"];
"API interface mismatch?" -> "Apply Adapter Pattern" [label="yes"];
"API interface mismatch?" -> "If/else branching?" [label="no"];
"If/else branching?" -> "Apply Strategy Pattern" [label="yes"];
"If/else branching?" -> "Sequential pipeline?" [label="no"];
"Sequential pipeline?" -> "Apply Chain Pattern" [label="yes"];
}
→ Full pattern details: scaling-patterns.md
Technology-Agnostic Design Checklist
Before finalizing a framework design, verify:
- Three layers clearly separated in directory structure (not mixed in one folder)
- Physical Layer is swappable — can change from Selenium to Playwright by replacing only Physical Layer files
- Action Layer is test-framework agnostic — actions work regardless of pytest, JUnit, TestNG, etc.
- Selectors are centralized — UI selectors live in a constants file, not scattered across code
- Fixtures/setup are isolated — test configuration (conftest, base classes) doesn't contain business logic
- Dependencies flow downward — Test → Action → Physical, never upward
Migration from Page Object Model
When converting existing POM code to DAA:
- Identify selectors/locators in Page Objects → move to Physical Layer (or constants)
- Extract business logic and assertions from Page Objects → move to Action Layer
- Simplify test files to pure declarative calls → Test Layer
- Verify no test file imports Page Objects or Physical Layer directly
- Add self-verification to every Action method (the step most POM code is missing)