report-quality-review
Monitors and improves radiology report quality through systematic audit and feedback. Use when user mentions "report quality review", "discrepancy audit", "report completeness", "addendum analysis", or needs quality assurance.
Report Quality Review Skill
Triggers
- "report quality review"
- "discrepancy audit"
- "report completeness"
- "addendum analysis"
- "quality improvement"
- "peer review"
- "report turnaround"
Parameters
review_type(required): Type of quality reviewcompleteness- Required element adherencediscrepancy- Error and miss analysisturnaround- TAT compliance monitoringcommunication- Critical result documentationattribution- Report signature verificationcqi- Continuous quality improvement tracking
modality(optional): Filter by imaging typetime_range(optional): Review period - defaults to last 30 daysurgency(optional): Filter by clinical setting (ED, inpatient, outpatient)
Quality Metrics Tracked
- Completeness: Required elements, comparison documentation, impression presence
- Accuracy: Discrepancy rates, addendum rates, amended findings
- Timeliness: TAT by setting, protocol compliance, pending report alerts
- Communication: Critical result documentation, escalation compliance
- Format: Structured data presence,标准化 terminology use
Output Format
Returns structured JSON with:
- Quality score by metric category
- Trend analysis (improving/declining)
- Individual radiologist feedback (anonymized aggregates)
- Improvement recommendations
- Peer review learning points
Usage Examples
review_type: completeness
modality: CT
time_range: last_month
review_type: discrepancy
time_range: last_quarter
urgency: ED
Integration Points
- RIS for report content and timestamps
- PACS for comparison study tracking
- Communication logs for critical result verification
- Peer review system for discrepancy classification