wikipedia-not-ai
Detect AI-generated text using Wikipedia-based patterns and structural signals.
AI Text Detection Guide
Based on Wikipedia's community-maintained guide (editorial heuristics, not a definitive detector). Applicable to any text — not just Wikipedia.
How to analyze text
Scan for signals across the categories below.
Weight clusters more heavily than isolated occurrences:
- One signal → coincidence
- Multiple signals in proximity → strong indicator
Output format (strict)
For each detected signal:
- Quote: exact fragment from the text
- Category: which signal type it belongs to
- Explanation: short, specific reasoning
Then:
Final verdict: Likely AI / Possibly AI / Likely Human
Confidence: Low / Medium / High
1. AI Vocabulary Density (strongest signal)
LLMs statistically overuse specific words. Check for density and clustering.
See word-lists.md for full lists.
Quick scan examples:
pivotal, underscore, tapestry, delve, meticulous, vibrant, intricate, testament, bolstered, garner, fostering, showcasing, align with, enhance, highlighting
Rule:
- 1 word → ignore
- 3+ → suspicious
- 5+ in short passage → strong signal
2. Content Patterns
Significance inflation
Adds artificial importance to neutral facts.
Examples:
- marks a pivotal moment
- represents a shift
- underscores its importance
- reflects broader trends
Challenges formula
Rigid structure:
- "Despite X, it faces challenges..."
- "Despite these challenges..."
Superficial -ing clauses
Adds fake analytical depth at sentence end:
- highlighting its importance
- underscoring the significance
Vague attribution (weasel language)
No clear source:
- Experts argue
- Studies suggest
- Observers have noted
Promotional / travel tone
Unnaturally warm or рекламный стиль:
- vibrant
- breathtaking
- rich cultural heritage
- renowned
3. Sentence Structure Tells
Copula avoidance
Avoids simple verbs:
- ❌ serves as → ✅ is
- ❌ boasts → ✅ has
Negative parallelisms
Formulaic balance:
- Not only X, but also Y
- It's not just X, it's Y
Rule of three
Unnatural triplets:
- X, Y, and Z used excessively
Elegant variation
Unnatural synonym switching:
- subject → the figure → this individual
4. Formatting Tells
- Title Case headings everywhere
- Excessive bold text
- Emoji usage 🎯
- Em dash overuse
- Inline bold definition lists
- Unnecessary tables
- Curly quotes
5. Communication Leakage
Artifacts from chat interface:
- I hope this helps
- Let me know if you need
- Would you like me to
Also:
- placeholders
[INSERT...] - subject lines inside body
- meta-statements about the document
6. Citation & Markup Artifacts
Technical residue:
turn0search0contentReference[...]oai_citationutm_source=chatgpt.com[attached_file:1]<grok_card>
7. Older Model Tells (2022–2024)
- It's important to note that...
- In conclusion...
- Overall...
- abrupt cutoffs
False Positives — do NOT flag alone
- Correct grammar
- Formal tone
- Transition words
- Long structured text
- Unsourced claims
Scoring guideline
- 1–2 weak signals → Possibly AI (low confidence)
- 3–5 mixed signals → Likely AI (medium confidence)
- 5+ strong clustered signals → Likely AI (high confidence)
Clusters matter more than isolated signals.
Reference
- word-lists.md — vocabulary and pattern lists by model era